Home – Page 9 – South Asia Time

Home

Labour Wins UK General Election in Historic Landslide

London— In a seismic shift in British politics, the Labour Party has secured a decisive victory in the UK general election, ending 14 years of Conservative rule. Keir Starmer is set to become the new Prime Minister after Labour won 410 seats in the 650-seat House of Commons. The Conservative Party, reeling from a catastrophic defeat, managed to secure only 118 seats, marking their worst performance in history.

“Change begins now,” declared Starmer in his victory speech, emphasizing his commitment to addressing the nation’s challenges. Outgoing Prime Minister Rishi Sunak acknowledged the voters’ “sobering verdict” as he prepared to leave office.

The Liberal Democrats also celebrated significant gains, while the Scottish National Party (SNP) suffered substantial losses, losing dozens of seats. High-profile Conservative figures, including former Prime Minister Liz Truss, Defence Secretary Grant Shapps, Jacob Rees-Mogg, and Penny Mordaunt, were among the casualties of the night.

In a notable development, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage secured a seat in Parliament, with the party winning four seats. The Green Party also matched this number, achieving their best election result to date.

With nearly all results tallied, the Labour victory represents both a remarkable triumph for Starmer and a formidable set of challenges ahead. He inherits a nation grappling with economic difficulties, widespread distrust in institutions, and a fragmented social landscape.

Rishi Sunak is scheduled to depart No. 10 Downing Street for the last time at 10:30 BST, and will formally resign to the King at Buckingham Palace. Keir Starmer is expected to be appointed shortly thereafter and will arrive at No. 10 around 12:20 BST to begin his tenure as Prime Minister.

UK General Election Sees Unprecedented AI Candidate in Brighton Pavilion

LONDON – In a historic first, an artificial intelligence (AI) entity is running as an independent candidate in the United Kingdom’s general election. Businessman Steve Endacott is contesting for the Brighton Pavilion constituency, represented by his AI avatar, ‘AI Steve.’

As voters head to the polls today, they will find AI Steve listed on the ballot papers. Powered by Endacott’s Neural Voice company, AI Steve was introduced as a response to Endacott’s frustration with traditional politics. He aims to leverage AI technology to “re-invent democracy.”

AI Steve has launched a LinkedIn page to engage with the constituency’s 45,000 residents. According to its bio, the AI candidate proposes policies through a transparent voting process, validated by a separate group of Validators who rate them on a scale of 1 to 10. A policy requires a 50 percent score to be adopted, ensuring that only widely supported initiatives are implemented.

The UK election commission has clarified that if AI Steve wins a seat in Parliament, the human candidate, Steve Endacott, would serve as the MP.

Across the UK, 46.5 million Britons are eligible to vote today, choosing MPs for 650 constituencies. The election sees Prime Minister Rishi Sunak in a tight race with Labour Party leader Keir Starmer, each vying for a majority government. A win for the Labour Party would signify a decisive power shift, ending the Conservative Party’s tenure under Sunak.

Nepal’s Political Landscape Shifts as Major Party Exits Coalition

KATHMANDU, Nepal — In a significant political development, Nepal’s second largest party, the Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist Leninist), announced its withdrawal from the government on Thursday. This move intensifies the pressure on Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal to resign.

The withdrawal was marked by the resignation of all the party’s ministers late Wednesday, following an agreement signed on Tuesday with the Nepali Congress, Nepal’s largest party. The agreement aims to establish a new coalition to govern for the remaining three years before the next general elections.

Prime Minister Dahal, who has been in office since December 2022, has been leading a precarious coalition government. His party finished third in the last election, leading him to frequently switch coalition partners to maintain a majority. In March, Dahal survived a no-confidence vote after a smaller coalition party defected. He now faces the challenge of seeking a confidence motion within a month if he does not step down immediately.

This is Dahal’s third term as prime minister since his Maoist group ended its armed insurgency and joined mainstream politics in 2006. Known as Prachanda, or the “fierce one,” Dahal led a decade-long violent insurgency from 1996 to 2006, which resulted in over 17,000 deaths and many unresolved disappearances.

After transitioning to politics, Dahal’s party won the most parliamentary seats in 2008, making him prime minister. However, he resigned a year later due to disagreements with the president.

The current political turmoil underscores the instability that has plagued Nepal’s government in recent years, as shifting alliances and coalition politics continue to dominate the landscape.

UK General Election Polls Open: Historic Vote Underway

July 4 – After an intense six-week election campaign, the moment of decision has arrived as polls open across the United Kingdom. Millions of voters will head to 40,000 polling stations throughout England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland to elect their new Members of Parliament (MPs).

In a historic first for a UK general election, voters casting their ballots in person must present photo identification. This new requirement aims to enhance the integrity of the voting process, ensuring each vote cast is legitimate and verified.

Polling stations will be open until 22:00 BST, after which the vote counting will commence immediately. The first seat declarations are anticipated to be announced approximately an hour after polls close.

Stay tuned for live updates as the nation votes in what could be a pivotal election shaping the future of the UK.

Apple Integrates ChatGPT into Siri and Operating Systems in Major AI Push

LONDON – Apple announced a significant upgrade to its Siri voice assistant and operating systems by integrating OpenAI’s ChatGPT, in a bid to stay competitive in the fast-evolving AI landscape. The announcement came during Apple’s annual Worldwide Developers Conference on Monday.

The iPhone maker introduced “Apple Intelligence,” a personalized AI system designed to enhance user interaction with Apple devices. This system integrates ChatGPT through a partnership with developer OpenAI, enhancing tools like text and content generation. A test version will be available this autumn.

Tim Cook, Apple’s CEO, emphasized the transformative potential of this integration, stating it would elevate Apple products “to new heights.” The announcement, however, was met with criticism from Elon Musk, owner of Tesla and Twitter/X, who raised concerns about data security. Musk threatened to ban iPhones from his companies, accusing Apple of compromising user data by collaborating with OpenAI.

Apple has faced mounting pressure to innovate in AI, lagging behind rivals who have aggressively adopted the technology. After losing its status as the world’s most valuable company to Microsoft in January and subsequently to Nvidia in June, the tech giant’s AI initiatives aim to reassure investors and regain market confidence.

Ben Wood, chief analyst at CCS Insight, noted that while Apple’s new AI system could appease investors, the reliance on ChatGPT highlights Siri’s limitations. “This sees Apple admitting its limitations given ChatGPT will kick in at a point where Siri is no longer able to help a user,” Wood told the BBC.

What is ‘Apple Intelligence’?

“Apple Intelligence” is a new AI framework embedded across Apple’s ecosystem. It aims to streamline user interactions, from refining message drafts to optimizing travel routes for calendar appointments. Unlike Microsoft’s AI assistant Copilot, Apple Intelligence will not require additional activation fees.

Siri has been revamped with a new interface and a more conversational approach, enhancing user experience across devices and apps. Apple assured that privacy remains a priority, with some processing done on-device and larger tasks handled in the cloud without data storage.

Craig Federighi, Apple’s Senior Vice President of Software Engineering, highlighted the system’s privacy-centric design, stating it combines powerful generative models with strong privacy protections.

Implications of the OpenAI Partnership

Apple’s collaboration with OpenAI marks a significant shift for a company known for tightly controlling its products. This move follows scrutiny faced by Google and Microsoft over AI-related errors, emphasizing the challenges of integrating advanced AI technologies.

Historically, Apple has restricted app downloads to its App Store and mandated the use of its Safari browser for security reasons, only relenting under EU regulatory pressure. The partnership with OpenAI suggests a recognition of ChatGPT’s current dominance in AI, signaling a strategic pivot for Apple.

In addition to AI advancements, Apple announced the UK release date for its mixed reality headset, the Vision Pro, set for 12 July. Other new features revealed at the conference include satellite texting, scheduled messages, AirPods Pro control via head gestures, a cross-device password manager, and enhanced app privacy options using Face ID or passcodes.

This AI integration marks a pivotal moment for Apple as it seeks to reassert its position in the tech industry amid rapid advancements by competitors.

Study Uncovers Severe Exploitation of Nepali Workers in Malaysian Detention Centers

London — A recent joint study by the Migrant Nepali Coordination Committee (PNCC) and the Center for the Study of Labor and Mobility (CESLAM) has unveiled alarming levels of exploitation faced by Nepali workers in Malaysian detention centers. The report, published on Sunday, calls for urgent rescue efforts and enhanced monitoring by the Nepali Embassy in Malaysia.

The comprehensive study analyzed the experiences of 758 Nepali workers who had returned to Nepal after being detained in Malaysian deportation centers. According to the findings, exploitation of Nepali workers has increased compared to previous years, with many detainees suffering from a lack of timely legal protection and facing significant stress due to delayed court hearings.

The report highlights several critical issues:

Urgent Need for Embassy Action: It recommends that the Nepali Embassy in Malaysia actively monitor detention centers and collaborate with local authorities to facilitate the rescue and treatment of detained Nepali workers. The study underscores the necessity of ensuring proper oversight and control over the conditions faced by Nepali detainees.

High Costs of Legal Services: The report emphasizes the prohibitive costs of legal consultation in Malaysia, noting, “The expense of hiring a lawyer is considerable. Failing to appoint a lawyer promptly leads to delays in court hearings, causing stress for the workers and their families.” This financial burden further exacerbates the plight of detained workers, many of whom are unable to afford adequate legal representation.

High Arrest Rates Among Nepalis: The study found a high number of arrests among Nepali workers, particularly those who had left their companies. Statistics reveal that 61 percent of arrested individuals had abandoned their jobs. The reasons for imprisonment range from conflicts with colleagues or employers to serious offenses such as murder, theft, drug-related crimes, sale of fake alcohol, gambling, and kidnapping.

The report’s findings have prompted calls for immediate and coordinated action to address the exploitation of Nepali workers in Malaysia. It underscores the urgent need for the Nepali government and its embassy to take proactive measures to protect the rights and well-being of its citizens abroad.

As the situation continues to unfold, the Nepali community and international human rights organizations are expected to keep a close watch on developments and advocate for the humane treatment of migrant workers. The hope is that increased attention and concerted efforts will lead to tangible improvements in the conditions faced by Nepali workers in Malaysian detention centers.

The 2024 battle bus map: where are Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer visiting and what does it tell us?

Alia Middleton

Senior Lecturer in Politics, University of Surrey

David Cutts

Professor of Political Science, University of Birmingham

One of the most important decisions party leaders have to make in an election campaign is where they want to visit. Their strategists will put together an itinerary of trips to schools, businesses, and community centres around the country.

We can always expect to see them trundling in on their battle buses to shake hands with local voters. And a lot can be gleaned from where they choose to make their stops.

The places

In a highly competitive contest, a leader’s satnav will be pre-programmed with directions to marginal seats – those with small majorities that could go either way. The smaller the majority, the greater the chance that local voters will see a campaign battle bus descending.

But in an election where a party expects to suffer losses, strategists will send leaders to safe seats to shore up support. Prime minister Rishi Sunak’s campaign has followed this strategy. Of the 39 seats (excluding his constituency) that he has visited as the last week of the campaign dawns, 87% have been his party’s own seats.

Join our readers who subscribe to free evidence-based news

Get newsletter

What’s more, Sunak has become more defensive as the election unfolds, increasing his visits to safe seats with a minimum 15% notional majority. Strikingly, this includes six visits to ultra-safe seats (30% plus majorities) in the past two weeks.

This is not the strategy of a confident party, but one of damage limitation in the face of some bruising polls – a hope to hang on to some heartland seats that look to be at risk of turning red.

So we have seen Sunak visit Torridge and Tavistock, boarding a lobster boat despite the party’s theoretically comfy 42 percentage point majority. And voters in Thirsk and Malton may have been surprised to see Sunak canvassing in their seat, considering it has only ever voted for a Conservative MP.

Conversely, Labour leader Keir Starmer has spent 82% of his visits so far in seats held by other parties. They were predominantly Conservative but also places where the Scottish National Party is the incumbent. Only five of the 27 non-Labour incumbent seats visited by Starmer have been marginal, like Bury North, where Starmer gave a speech on national security.

This might be described as a strategy of aggressive expansionism. Starmer is not spending time in what have been identified as easy wins – he is touching down in true blue territory like Nuneaton; a bellwether seat where the Conservative incumbent is defending a majority of more than 13,000. His approach fits the narrative of an opposition party on the front foot, aspiring to win a sizeable majority.

The people

Careful decisions also need to be made about the people party leaders are going to meet as they travel around. Interacting with the public can lead to awkward encounters for politicians, so leaders often look for structured scenarios to limit the threat.

Sunak has also changed tack in this respect as the campaign has developed. Question-and-answer sessions in workplaces have been largely jettisoned in favour of safer environments where conversation is minimal.

Although Starmer is still keen to be pictured chatting to workers, these, too are highly choreographed. This has been a common strategy for both of the two main parties in recent elections. Visits take place in an artificial environment that gives the impression a leader is responding to issues raised by the public, without the risk that anyone will go off script.

The shift towards these controlled meetings is in no small part down to an infamous incident involving former prime minister Gordon Brown during the 2010 election campaign.

Brown had travelled to Rochdale and had a short interaction with Gillian Duffy, a local woman. But when they went their separate ways, Brown was caught on a hot mic describing Duffy as a “bigoted woman”. The remark dominated the news and political discourse for the rest of the election.

Brown had been on a “walkabout” when he met Duffy – when a leader walks down a street and stops to chat to members of the public as they encounter them. These are the most fraught type of visits for party leaders.

By the final stage of the 2010 campaign, both David Cameron and Gordon Brown had completed just two walkabouts. It is perhaps unsurprising that neither Sunak nor Starmer have ventured out into the public in this non-scripted way in 2024.

The hospitals

The Duffy incident is not the only reason to consider the 2010 campaign. That was the last election in the UK where a party lost power after a long time in government. In 2024, Sunak is being even more defensive than Brown was that year, visiting even more safe seats.

There was also a notable focus on visiting hospitals, doctors and other emblems of the NHS. Both Brown and Cameron hot-footed it to hospitals on the first day of the 2010 election campaign. And with a week to go before polling day, Cameron had made three healthcare-related visits. In the final week of the campaign he made a further three such visits. Brown made another two.

Their choices are understandable. Leaders tend to visit locations that help them convey their commitment to particular policy areas. And given that healthcare is often one of the most (if not the most) important issues in elections, leaders are usually keen to illustrate their commitment to the NHS by visiting a hospital or a GP practice. Starmer has done exactly this in 2024, visiting a medical school and two hospitals.

Sunak is, however, the outlier here. Remarkably, despite the salience of the NHS to voters in 2024, Sunak has yet to visit a single healthcare setting.

Where next?

The patterns mapped out in previous elections give us a good indication of what Starmer and Sunak’s travel itineraries will look like in the final days of the campaign. Their visits will ramp up in frequency and we should expect to see a lot of them. Cameron managed to visit 22 seats in the final week of the 2010 campaign. Brown managed nine on a single day.

Leaders’ visits are more than just window dressing. They tell us a great deal about a party’s electoral strategy and what their expectations are for the big day. In 2010, Brown’s campaign visits map told the story of Labour dominance coming to an end. Today they tell us a similar story for the Conservatives. ( From : The Conversations)

Climate Change Exposes Bodies on Everest as Efforts to Retrieve Frozen Mountaineers Intensify

Kathmandu – As climate change thins the snow and ice on Mount Everest, the remains of mountaineers who perished on the world’s highest peak are increasingly being exposed. This year, a dedicated team braved the treacherous slopes not to reach the summit but to retrieve some of these bodies, a grim testament to the mountain’s deadly allure.

Five frozen bodies, including one reduced to skeletal remains, were recovered as part of Nepal’s mountain clean-up campaign on Everest and the neighboring peaks of Lhotse and Nuptse. The mission, led by Aditya Karki, a major in Nepal’s army, involved 12 military personnel and 18 climbers. “Because of the effects of global warming, the bodies and trash are becoming more visible as the snow cover thins,” Karki explained.

More than 300 climbers have died on Everest since expeditions began in the 1920s, with eight fatalities this season alone. Many bodies remain on the mountain, some hidden by snow or lost in deep crevasses. Others, preserved in their colorful climbing gear, have become macabre landmarks, such as the well-known “Green Boots” and “Sleeping Beauty.”

Karki highlighted the psychological toll on climbers who encounter these bodies, saying, “People believe that they are entering a divine space when they climb mountains, but if they see dead bodies on the way up, it can have a negative effect.” The recovery operations are fraught with danger, especially in the “death zone,” where thin air and low oxygen levels heighten the risk of altitude sickness.

One particularly challenging recovery involved a body encased in ice up to its torso, taking the team 11 hours to free using hot water and axes. Tshiring Jangbu Sherpa, who led the body retrieval expedition, described the difficulty of the task: “Getting the body out is one part; bringing it down is another challenge.” He noted that some bodies appeared almost untouched, still in full climbing gear.

The process of retrieving bodies at high altitudes is controversial and costly, requiring up to eight rescuers for each body and thousands of dollars. At high altitudes, the physical ability to carry heavy loads is severely diminished, making the task even more arduous.

Despite the challenges, Karki insists the effort is necessary. “We have to bring them back as much as possible,” he said. “If we keep leaving them behind, our mountains will turn into a graveyard.” Bodies are typically wrapped in bags and placed on plastic sleds to be dragged down the mountain.

Rakesh Gurung from Nepal’s tourism department stated that two bodies had been preliminarily identified, with detailed tests pending for final confirmation. The retrieved bodies are now in Kathmandu, with unidentified remains likely to be cremated.

The mountain clean-up campaign, funded with over $600,000, also employed 171 Nepali guides and porters to remove 11 tonnes of rubbish from Everest. The waste included fluorescent tents, discarded climbing equipment, empty gas canisters, and even human excreta.

“The mountains have given us mountaineers so many opportunities,” Sherpa remarked. “I feel that we have to give back to them; we have to remove the trash and bodies to clean the mountains.” Despite the efforts to remove recent waste, historic rubbish still litters the mountain. “This year’s trash might be brought back by the mountaineers,” Karki said. “But who will bring the old ones?”

As the impact of climate change continues to reveal more of Everest’s deadly secrets, the need for dedicated recovery and clean-up efforts becomes increasingly urgent.

The Lib Dems have a plan to fix NHS, protect local environment, and tackle the cost of living crisis’ –  Chelsea Whyte 

CHELSEA WHYTE is the Liberal Democrat candidate for Slough. Chelsea has been a consistent volunteer and campaigner for local organisations, including volunteering full-time at her local food bank during the Covid-19 pandemic after losing herjob because of Brexit. Seeing first hand the struggles that too many families face when trying to feed themselves re-affirmed Chelsea’s commitment to tackling the rising cost of living andSlough’s housing crisis.

Now a senior public affairs and strategic communications consultant, Chelsea has experience working with international businesses across a range of sectors including energy,manufacturing, legal and finance. Chelsea has a legal background and has worked at various levels of government, including at the European Parliament in Brussels. Understanding the globalised nature of business, she has long-campaigned for the UK’sposition in Europe and at the heart of international debate. As an avid rower in her free time, Chelsea is passionate about the Lib Dems’ policy to stop water companies dumping sewage, having witnessed the decline in our waterways over recent years. She is particularly concerned about the risk of harm to people and wildlife. She spoke to SOUTH ASIA TIME regarding her ongoing campaign. Excerpts of the interview:

Now that elections are taking place on 4th July, how is your canvassing going on? What type of response are you getting on doorsteps?

We’ve had a fantastic reception in Slough, getting out to meet voters on doorsteps, at local places of worship, and at all the hustings we’ve had so far. It’s clear people want a fresh voice that isn’t embroiled in the stale politics of the past, and they see the Liberal Democrats as that option. We elected three fantastic new Lib Dem councillors locally last year and the momentum is continuing to grow.

What is your main message to the voters? What are your main agenda for Slough?

Our main campaign issues have been focused on:

● Fixing the crisis in our NHS – the Conservatives have neglected our health and social care services for too long, and it’s having a detrimental impact on the everyday lives of people in Slough, some of whom struggle to get appointments and stay healthy.

● Addressing the rising cost of living – the pressure on public finances has hit particularly hard in Slough, especially since Labour bankrupted the council a few years ago. We want to see more funding for local government to ensure essential services can continue in places like Slough. We also want to support local families by scrapping the two-child limit and cap on benefits and extending free school meals to all primary school children and even more secondary school pupils.

● Protecting our local environment – we are fortunate to have beautiful parks and rivers which are home to important wildlife that forms an essential part of our ecosystem. But the natural environment is under constant threat from developers and water companies that have no concern for the way they treat our local communities. We want to see a general duty of care for the environment and hold big businesses to account for things like sewage dumping in our rivers.

● Campaigning for a ceasefire in Gaza and an independent Palestine.

Labour party is far ahead than Tories in the opinion polls and they are calling on Britons to vote for change.  Don’t you see the prospect of Tories benefitting in your constituency out of the three-way contest?

Slough is actually an 11-way contest this time and in a unique position when compared to the national political picture. Labour had a stronghold in this area for a long time, eventually leading to the financial ruin of the local authority. Local people used their votes last year to elect Liberal Democrat councillors for the first time in years. We are hoping to see this trend continue locally. The Conservatives nationally have let our essential services fall into disrepair by cutting funding to public spending. The Liberal Democrats have a plan to fix our NHS, protect our local environment, and tackle the cost of living crisis. We are seeing a lot of support for these policies locally and hope voters keep this in mind on 4th July.

One of the main concerns of local residents has been long queues at the NHS, incidences of burglary and potholes on the road. How will your party address these concerns?

● The Lib Dems want to fix our health and social care services, believing that the two must be tackled hand in hand for long-term success. Included in our manifesto is:

○ The right to see a GP within seven days, or within 24 hours if they urgently need to, with 8,000 more GPs to deliver on it.

○ Guaranteed access to an NHS dentist for everyone needing urgent and emergency care, ending DIY dentistry and ‘dental deserts’.

○ Create a social care workforce plan, establish a Royal College of Care Workers to improve recognition and career progression, and introduce a higher Carer’s Minimum Wage.

● Slough has seen crime, and violent crime in particular, increase to worrying levels. The Liberal Democrats believe everyone has the right to feel safe in their local community. Included in our manifesto is:

○ Restoring proper community policing, where officers are visible, trusted and focused on preventing and solving crimes – especially rape and other violent crime.

○ Creating a new statutory guarantee that all burglaries will be attended by the police and properly investigated.

○ Investing in the criminal justice system to tackle the backlog of court cases and ensure swift justice.

● The state of our roads and increasing number of potholes is an issue across the country. Unfortunately, this is something which falls under the responsibility of local authorities and is a service severely underfunded because of years of Conservative cuts to public spending. The Liberal Democrats want to tackle the funding crisis in local government and ensure councils like Slough can get back to delivering the services everyone expects and deserves.

Slough is known for ethnic diversity and cultural harmony.  How will you support to promote cultural harmony in your constituency if you get elected?

We are fortunate in the UK, and indeed in Slough, to have such diverse communities. Unfortunately, the Conservatives have created a hostile environment in which some people feel like they don’t belong. The Liberal Democrats stand for “a fair, free and open society, in which we seek to balance the fundamental values of liberty, equality and community, and in which no-one shall be enslaved by poverty, ignorance or conformity.” If elected, I will use these values as the pillar for which I represent the voters of Slough and try to create community cohesion across the constituency.

How do you see the contributions of South Asian community in the UK?

I want to see us return to the welcoming country we once were, where we value the different backgrounds and cultural experiences that different communities bring. We have a lot to learn from each other, and, as the late, great Jo Cox said, “we have more in common than that which divides us”. I believe the South Asian community is essential to the Slough community and they have an important role to play in our continued growth.

On a personal note, what motivated you to become a full time politician?

Let’s be clear, I am not a full-time politician, yet! I would like to be the next Member of Parliament for Slough, which is a full-time position, but until that happens, I remain a voluntary campaigner. I have a full-time job which I have had to juggle alongside the campaign.  

I got into politics because I was tired of the broken two-party politics in the UK, and the perception it is the best this country could do. I am passionate about reforming our political system, including by introducing proportional representation, so everyone feels like their vote matters, and to eliminate the need for tactical voting.

Having studied law at university, it was clear that a lot of our laws are stuck in the past and in need of updating. I want to see competent and trustworthy people do that, and I hope I could be that person for Slough.

Finally, your message to the voters?

For a fair deal for everyone in Slough, vote Liberal Democrat on 4th July.

Sunak and Starmer Clash in Final Debate Ahead of 4 July General Election

London, 27 June 2024 – Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer engaged in a heated debate last night, their final showdown before the upcoming general election on 4 July. The two leaders sparred on a variety of critical issues, including tax policies, immigration, Brexit, and gender rights.

Sunak accused Starmer of planning significant tax increases and lacking a coherent strategy on immigration. “Labour’s tax hikes will stifle economic growth and hurt working families,” Sunak argued. He also criticized Starmer’s stance on immigration, suggesting the Labour leader has no viable plan to manage the issue.

In response, Starmer lambasted Sunak, claiming the prime minister had been pressured into addressing the political betting scandal. “Rishi Sunak is out of touch with the everyday concerns of voters and is only acting now because he’s been bullied into it,” Starmer retorted.

Both leaders continue their vigorous campaign efforts today as the election race reaches its final stretch. Sunak will face the media during a visit to a Derbyshire factory and later at a campaign event in Leeds. Meanwhile, Starmer will travel on the Labour battle bus through the North West and West Midlands, highlighting Labour’s plans for incorporating work experience programs in schools.

Other political leaders are also making their final pushes. Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey will participate in a BBC 5 Live phone-in with Nicky Campbell at 9 am, followed by visits to the North West, West Midlands, and Oxfordshire. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage will speak at a rally in County Durham, and SNP leader John Swinney will campaign in Edinburgh.

Chinese Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs Arrives in Kathmandu for Diplomatic Consultation

Kathmandu, June 24, 2024 – Sun Weidong, Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, arrived in Kathmandu this morning for a three-day official visit. He was warmly welcomed by Krishna Prasad Dhakal, Joint Secretary and Head of the North East Asia Division of Nepal’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, at the VIP Lounge of Tribhuvan International Airport.

Vice Minister Weidong is in Kathmandu to attend the Sixteenth Meeting of the Nepal-China Diplomatic Consultation Mechanism, scheduled for June 25. The Nepali delegation, led by Foreign Secretary Sewa Lamsal, will include senior officials from various ministries. Vice Minister Weidong will head the Chinese delegation.

The meetings will focus on discussing the overall areas of bilateral relations and cooperation between Nepal and China. In addition to attending the diplomatic consultation, Vice Minister Weidong is scheduled to pay courtesy calls on President Ramchandra Paudel and Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal ‘Prachanda’.

Vice Minister Weidong is set to depart Kathmandu on June 26, 2024.

Air Pollution Emerges as Leading Risk Factor for Death in South Asia, Says New Report

New Delhi, 18 July 2024 – Air pollution has become the leading risk factor for death in South Asia, according to the recently published State of Global Air (SoGA) report for 2024. The report highlights that air pollution not only poses a severe threat to the general population but is also the second leading risk factor for deaths in children under five years old in the region.

The report reveals alarming statistics: in 2021, air pollution accounted for 8.1 million deaths globally, with more than 700,000 of these deaths among children under five. This makes air pollution the second most significant risk factor for death globally, surpassing even tobacco and poor diet. In South Asia, levels of PM2.5 and ozone have been particularly high, with 56% of all global ozone deaths reported in the region in 2021.

Impact on South Asia

The report underscores that South Asia experiences some of the highest exposures to PM2.5 globally. While levels of PM2.5 are stabilizing in many countries, the exposure remains dangerously high. Additionally, ozone levels have increased over the past decade, exacerbating health risks. In 2021, India recorded the highest number of deaths in children under five, with air pollution being a significant contributor.

Children’s Vulnerability

Children under five are especially vulnerable to the detrimental effects of air pollution. The report links air pollution to serious health issues in children, such as premature birth, low birth weight, asthma, and lung diseases. In 2021, exposure to air pollution contributed to over 260,600 deaths of children under five globally, making it the second-leading risk factor for death in this age group in South Asia, after malnutrition.

The impact of household air pollution, primarily from cooking with polluting fuels like wood, coal, and dung, is particularly severe. This type of pollution was responsible for approximately 500,000 child deaths globally in 2021.

Pollutants of Concern

The SoGA report highlights several pollutants that significantly impact health, including PM2.5, ozone (O3), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). PM2.5, consisting of tiny particles that can enter the bloodstream, is associated with various noncommunicable diseases such as heart disease, stroke, diabetes, lung cancer, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The report identifies PM2.5 as the most consistent predictor of poor health outcomes globally.

Nitrogen dioxide, primarily from traffic exhaust, poses severe health risks, particularly in densely populated urban areas. The development of childhood asthma is strongly linked to NO2 exposure.

Ozone levels have also risen, with deaths due to ozone exposure in India increasing from 93,000 in 2000 to 272,000 in 2021. Nearly half of the total ozone-related deaths occurred in India.

Children’s Health Impact

The report emphasizes that children are uniquely vulnerable to air pollution. The adverse effects of pollution can begin in the womb and have lifelong consequences. Children inhale more air per kilogram of body weight compared to adults, making them more susceptible to pollutants. Conditions such as pneumonia, which accounts for one in five child deaths globally, and asthma, the most common chronic respiratory disease in older children, are linked to air pollution exposure.

The disparity in death rates due to air pollution among children under five is stark. South Asia’s death rate is 164 per 100,000 children, significantly higher than the global average of 108 per 100,000.

Positive Developments

Despite the grim statistics, there are signs of progress. Since 2000, the death rate for children under five linked to air pollution has decreased by 53%. This reduction is attributed to efforts to increase access to clean cooking energy, improve healthcare and nutrition, and raise awareness about the dangers of household air pollution.

Countries with severe air pollution issues are making strides in addressing the problem. Measures such as installing air pollution monitoring networks, implementing stricter policies, and promoting electric vehicles are showing measurable improvements in public health and air quality in regions including Africa, Latin America, and Asia.

While progress is being made, the SoGA report calls for intensified efforts to prevent air pollution from becoming the leading cause of death worldwide, emphasizing the need for continued and expanded initiatives to combat this critical health hazard.

Newham Celebrates South Asian Heritage Month with ‘Free to be Me’ Theme

London – Newham is delighted to announce a vibrant and diverse programme for South Asian Heritage Month, running from 18 July to 17 August, under the theme ‘Free to be Me’. This month-long celebration promises an array of events designed to educate and entertain residents of all ages. The events, ranging from spoken word performances and music to tea tales, art exhibitions, storytelling, and film screenings, are set to offer enriching experiences that honor South Asian heritage.

Residents can look forward to a variety of activities, starting with the Chai Chronicles: Exploring the History of South Asian Tea on Friday, 19 July, from 7-9pm at the Old Town Hall Stratford. This launch event features Shaheen Kasmani and Heiba Lemara, who will take attendees through the rich history of tea, coupled with a tea tasting experience. Artist Maryam Huq will present a collection of tea-inspired art pieces, blending art and taste in a unique cultural journey.

For the younger audience and adults alike, Momtaz-Begum Hossain will lead the Me on a Tee Workshop at East Ham Library on Saturday, 20 July. Kids aged 7-14 can participate from 11am-12.30pm, and adults from 3-5pm. This workshop will delve into the history of slogan t-shirts, allowing participants to customize their own, exploring identity and self-expression through art.

The History of Bharatanatyam will be explored on Tuesday, 23 July, from 3-5pm at Manor Park Library. Attendees will learn about this classical dance form’s origins in ancient Sanskrit texts, culminating in a performance that showcases its intricate beauty.

Continuing the celebration of tea, Chai Chronicles: A Talk with the Curators will take place on Saturday, 27 July, from 11am-12pm at Forest Gate Community Garden. Artist and curator Shaheen Kasmani will share her research and inspiration behind her work, accompanied by tea brewed from locally grown herbs.

For families with young children, Chai Chronicles: Design Your Own Teapot Workshop invites children aged 4+ to Forest Gate Library on Saturday, 27 July, from 3-4pm. Led by Maryam Huq, this workshop will inspire creativity through the design of vibrant and intricate teapots.

A highlight of the month is the film screening of “The Queen of My Dreams” on Sunday, 28 July at Roof East, in collaboration with the London Indian Film Festival. This film, directed by Fawzia Mirza, follows the coming-of-age stories of a Pakistani Muslim woman and her Canadian-born daughter, set against a backdrop of Bollywood fantasy.

Khayaal Theatre will present Stories from Central-South Asia on Monday, 29 July, from 10.30-11.30am at Forest Gate Community Garden, bringing to life tales from the region with vivid storytelling and props inspired by ancient Muslim theatre traditions.

On Friday, 2 August, from 10-12pm, the Wellbeing in the Garden event at Forest Gate Community Garden offers a relaxing summer walk, journaling, and discussions on holistic wellbeing, helping attendees to de-stress and connect with nature.

Sounds of South Asia in Green Street will bring a musical extravaganza to Queen’s Square on Saturday, 3 August, from 3-5pm, showcasing talented local musicians celebrating the subcontinent’s sounds.

The month concludes with various captivating events, including Stories of Freedom in Spoken Word & Music by Khiyo at Applecart Arts on Saturday, 10 August, from 6-8pm, a Walk Through the History of South Indian Clothing at Manor Park Library on Tuesday, 13 August, from 11-2pm, and a screening of Dev Patel’s “Monkey Man” followed by a Q&A at UCL East Campus on Thursday, 15 August, from 7-10pm.

The grand finale, Desi Daydream: A Throwback to the 80s South Asian Rave Scene, invites attendees to step back in time to the underground Bhangra raves of the 1980s. This event will be held at the Old Town Hall Stratford on Saturday, 17 August, from 7-10pm.

For more details and to book tickets, please visit the official website. Note that the programme is subject to change.

Location: Newham Dockside, 1000 Dockside Road, E16 2QU
Cost: Free

If you want change, vote for change : Primesh Patel

PRIMESH PATEL has worked in health and social care for nearly two decades. He served as a local Harrow Councillor from 2014 till 2022. He also served as a local school governor at Bentley Wood High School for many years. After being selected as Labour’s parliamentary candidate for Harrow East last year, Primesh has been knocking doors of local residents along with his colleagues. He spoke to SOUTH ASIA TIME regarding his ongoing campaign. Excerpts of the interview.

Now that elections are taking place on 4th July, how is your canvassing going on? What type of response are you getting on doorsteps?

We’ve been out on the doors week in, week out since I was selected 15 months ago and all through that time I’ve been struck by the warmth of the reception we’ve had and how consistent the message from voters has been. People are concerned at how hard it is to get a GP appointment, and they’re worries about crime and the rising cost of rents and mortgages. More than anything, there’s a sense that after years of chaos, it’s time for change.

 What is your main agenda for Harrow East?
My message to people here is that they have a choice at the General Election – more chaos and division with the Tories, or hope and unity with a changed Labour Party. In Harrow East that means more police on our streets, growth and economic stability for local businesses, and better, faster services at Belmont walk-in centre and Northwick Park Hospital.

Sir Keir Starmer is asking Britons to vote for change.  How different will the new government be if Labour wins the next election?
This General Election offers the chance for hope and stability in our country after years of chaos under the Tories. We’ve set out what this looks like in Keir Starmer’s First Steps for Change, including 6,500 new teachers to give our kids the best start in life, economic stability with tough spending rules and the creation of Great British Energy to cut bills and carbon emissions.

One of the main concerns of local residents has been long queues at the NHS, incidences of burglary and potholes on the road. How will the Labour party address these problems if people vote you to power?
Labour is committed to cutting NHS waiting times with 40,000 more appointments each week and cutting crime with 13,000 extra police officers and PCSOs – including 1,300 here in London. And when it comes to potholes – such a visible sign of the decline we’ve seen under the Tories – Labour will give local councils the stability and security they need with multi-year funding settlements.

Critics say Labour believes in tax and spend. Where will the money come from to spend in education, health and employment generation?
After 14 years of Conservative Government, working people are facing the highest tax burden in 70 years. That’s why Labour will not raise income tax, national insurance or VAT. Unlike the Tories, we have been clear about how we will pay for our first steps in government: by making the tax system fairer, for instance by closing loopholes for the mega-rich, and introducing a proper windfall tax on the energy giants. And all of our manifesto will be fully costed – no ifs, no buts.

Harrow East is known for ethnic diversity and cultural harmony.  How will you support and promote cultural harmony in your constituency if you get elected?
There’s perhaps no greater responsibility for a Member of Parliament than to promote harmony, co-operation and respect in our community and doing so will always be my first priority. I will do so by supporting all our diverse communities in Harrow East, addressing their concerns and attending community events. I will be an MP for everybody.

How do you see the contributions of the South Asian community in the UK?
The South Asian community contribute to the cultural, intellectual and economic life of this country in so many ways. Our community helped rebuild this country after the war, worked in factories and mills, staffed the NHS, created businesses large and small, transformed Britain’s food culture, created great works of art, and so much more. My own parents came to the UK with little and worked hard to give me the best start in life. I am so proud to be British, and so proud to be of Indian and South Asian descent.

On a personal note, what motivated you to become a full time politician?

Harrow East is my home and there is nowhere else I would want to represent. For me, politics is about service to country and local community. The Conservatives have let Harrow East and the country down. It’s time for change. I want to help people have as much pride in Harrow East as I do and will advocate fiercely for our home and community in Parliament. Labour will fix the NHS, tackle crime, improve our schools and help support local businesses. 

So, what would you like to tell your voters?

I would like to pay tribute to the Nepalese community for their immeasurable contributions to Harrow and the country. It fills me with pride to count so many amongst my friends. I will be an MP for everyone in Harrow East. So, if you want change, vote for change on Thursday, 4th July. Vote Labour.

Election 2024: migrants aren’t to blame for Britain’s housing crisis

Migration has become “the most toxic issue” in British politics, driving intensely emotional debates that are often based on prejudice and misunderstanding. Similarly emotional is housing – a finite resource in high demand at a time of crisis. Throughout Europe, housing shortages have become political battlegrounds, easily exploitable by right-wing, populist parties.

Reform UK has blamed mass immigration for many of the country’s problems, including the housing crisis and NHS waiting lists. The Conservative party manifesto includes a promise to legislate new “new ‘Local Connection’ and ‘UK Connection’ tests for social housing in England, to ensure this valuable but limited resource is allocated fairly”. This echoes a consultation opened by the government earlier this year on a policy of “British Homes for British Workers”.

These arguments rely on misguided understandings about how migration and housing are intertwined, and scapegoat migrants for the government’s own failures in providing homes. While the two issues can overlap, there is no evidence of a causal connection between a lack of available accommodation and levels of migration.

There is some evidence that migration has increased house prices, but the scale of this effect, and the causal relationship, is difficult to assess. Particularly in social housing, there are other factors affecting supply and demand, such as the Right to Buy, other government policies and the construction of new homes.

There are already many barriers in place to stop migrants from accessing social housing. Foreign-born nationals make up a very small proportion of social renters. “British homes for British workers” is a policy looking for a problem.

Around 80% of migrants who have lived in the UK for less than five years live in the private sector compared to 20% of the UK born population. Research also shows that around 20% of migrants live in social rented accommodation (a similar figure to the UK population). And government statistics show that 90% of lead tenants in social housing are UK nationals.

The real cause of housing shortages
The supply of social housing in England and Wales has decreased by 300,000 units since 2010. This is a consequence of austerity cuts to social housing funding, the Right to Buy, demolitions and properties converting to “affordable” rents as per 2011 UK government directive to permit rents to be set at 80% of market rent. While below market levels, these are rarely affordable to low-income households in high demand areas.

Supply of new homes is falling well short of demand from the local population. According to the National Housing Federation, only 8,386 new social homes were built in England in 2022-23. In the same period, councils recognised 52,800 households as requiring help because they were homeless or threatened with homelessness.

As a group of social housing sector leaders pointed out in a letter to the prime minister, proposals that make it harder for people to get on the housing register are more likely to force people into homelessness. They certainly do not stop people from needing a place to live. Migrants represent nearly a fifth of all homeless households.

There is already plenty of existing legislation that already makes it difficult for migrants to access social housing. Homelessness legislation in England stipulates that applicants demonstrate a local connection to their area to receive priority for social housing. This means that many migrants are instead directed to the private rented sector.

Recent migrants are also likely to be low priority applicants as they will not have had sufficient time on waiting lists. Studies have shown very limited use of social housing by migrants, often in specific areas. And some groups – including refugees, asylum seekers and students – are unlikely to qualify at all, as they have no access to public funds.

The Right to Rent provisions of the 2014 Immigration Act, which were designed to make it more difficult for migrants without legal status to access all rented accommodation, contains strict limitations on eligibility. Landlords are already obliged to check their tenants’ immigration status, so many will refrain from renting to migrants anyway.

All in all, there is no evidence of widespread opportunism among migrants taking advantage of a lax housing allocation system. And blaming migration for housing shortages allows politicians to distract from the real causes.

As the above-cited letter from housing professionals comments: “Further rationing of an already scarce resource does not address the failures of the last 40 years.” Rather than excluding groups from accessing housing, whoever is next in Number 10 must prioritise making this resource more plentiful. Both main parties have promised to build homes, but without making them affordable and accessible, the housing crisis will continue.

UK election: how the parties differ on their approach to the NHS

Peter Sivey, University of York

In the UK, the NHS is always one of the most discussed issues in an election campaign and rates high in polls of voters’ priorities. Health and the NHS have also dominated the political debate for the last parliament, with the COVID pandemic and subsequent crises in primary care, elective and emergency hospital care dominating the airwaves. What are the parties offering in their manifestos in this election and how do they stack up?

The Conservatives plans are largely a continuation of current policies, including a continued commitment to the new hospitals building programme and the long-term workforce plan.

The long-term workforce plan was widely welcomed when it was first announced; however, the associated financial commitments are not addressed in the Conservatives manifesto. The focus on delivering existing policies has benefits, as the NHS has a history of politically driven reorganisation and large policy changes.

However, the Conservatives are also promising nothing on real-term spending increases, implying a slower rate of growth of funding in the coming years.

Historically, the government usually gives in to short-term pressure from NHS organisations, and funds are usually “topped up” with extra increases year to year. In 2019, the NHS long-term plan gave more financial certainty with large spending increases for the following five years. Unfortunately, nothing like this is promised by the main parties in this election.

The Conservatives have one outright unhelpful proposal: cutting NHS management to save money. Evidence shows that, if anything, the NHS has too little management compared with other comparable countries.

Cutting management to direct funding to the front line is often regarded as a “myth” of NHS policy. With fewer managers, care is less well organised, and doctors and nurses have to do more management activities themselves, reducing their time for patient-facing activity.

Labour’s landmark proposal is to fund an increase of 40,000 appointments per week, by paying staff to work overtime at evenings and weekends. This is coupled with a re-commitment to the 18-week waiting time target.

The policy seems to be focused mainly on outpatient appointments, and this is politically smart. Some of the longest waits are for outpatient appointments. And certainly, in the short term, it is much less costly to increase outpatient appointments than rates of major surgery.

An increase of 40,000 per week is roughly 2 million per year. This sounds like a lot, but there were 145 million outpatient appointments in the English NHS last year so Labour are proposing an increase of less than 2%. Hardly gamechanging. In fact, the increase in appointments from 2021-22 to 2022-23 was equal to almost exactly this amount.

Labour’s other announcements are at least quite well matched to the needs of the NHS. They are promising a large increase in scanners and diagnostic equipment. This is an area where the UK lags way behind comparable countries, and hence is a well-targeted form of capital investment.

They are also promising an initial focus on recruiting more mental health staff. Mental health is one of the areas where demand for services is growing quickly.

The Liberal Democrats have some innovative proposals, including reforming the pay review system for the NHS to make it more independent from the government. They are also promising a large increase in the general practitioner workforce. And, similar to Labour, they are promising a fix to NHS emergency dental care.

Their costings document is also quite comprehensive and proposes some tax changes to fund the NHS and care proposals. However, their proposals are only slightly more ambitious than Labour or the Conservatives.

Overall, the main parties’ manifestos lack ambition on the NHS. While it may be welcome to avoid wholesale reforms (as seen in 2000 and 2012), the manifestos do not propose policies to tackle the NHS’s current challenges in primary, secondary and emergency care.

Compared with 2019 manifestos

One way to assess the 2024 manifestos is in comparison to the last election in 2019.

In 2019, the Conservatives unveiled the “40 new hospitals” policy, 6,000 new GPs and 50 million more GP appointments per year.

Labour had radical proposals to abolish the 2012 reforms and reduce private sector involvement in the NHS, as well as also expanding the GP workforce through increased training places. Both parties also had explicit promises on real-terms increases in funding, with a £26 billion increase promised by Labour and £20.5 billion by the Conservatives.

Of course, these policies – especially those of the election-winning Conservatives – have been much criticised. While real-term funding has increased in line with promises, the government has struggled to deliver on GP numbers and the new hospitals programme.

However, the nature of the debate and promises made in the 2019 election at least focused attention on these important issues. Without the promises, progress on improving the capital stock and expanding primary care may have been even slower.

The 2024 manifestos focus on a limited set of issues, including waiting lists and mental health. Other crucial elements of the NHS, such as the struggling emergency care system, are absent from the parties’ promises.

While the worst period for ambulance handover delays is hopefully behind us in 2022 and 2023, the emergency care system is still struggling to cope, and “corridor care” is becoming the norm.

There are limitations in how the political debate can interact with NHS policy. It is hard to communicate the driving factors behind NHS challenges, such as how technological improvements spur increases in demand, or how the medical workforce is affected by emigration as well as immigration.

Political manifestos gloss over these issues to make simple promises that the public can understand, like 6,000 more GPs, 40,000 more appointments or 40 new hospitals. But the lack of ambition in the 2024 manifestos is particularly concerning. It will be hard to hold the winning party to account for NHS performance when so little is being promised.

From : The Conversation