April 2021 – Page 3 – South Asia Time

Statement from the Queen confirms death of Prince Philip aged 99

London — Prince Philip, Queen Elizabeth II’s husband, has died aged 99, Buckingham Palace has announced. 

The prince married Princess Elizabeth in 1947, five years before she became Queen, and was the longest-serving royal consort in British history.

The couple had four children, eight grandchildren and 10 great-grandchildren.

A statement from Buckingham Palace said: “It is with deep sorrow that Her Majesty The Queen has announced the death of her beloved husband, His Royal Highness The Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, BBC writes.

“His Royal Highness passed away peacefully this morning at Windsor Castle.”

 

Transport minister of Taiwan offers to resign after deadly train crash

Taipei —  Taiwan Transport Minister Lin Chia-Lung has offered his resignation following the deadly train crash in the country that killed dozens of people.


In a phone call, Lin told Premier Su Tseng-chang that he wished to step down, to take responsibility for the Friday’s express train crash in eastern Taiwan, Focus Taiwan reported citing Cabinet spokesman Lo Ping-cheng on Sunday, ANI writes.


In response, Su commended Lin for wanting to show accountability but said that the focus right now is on repairing the railway line that was damaged during Friday’s accident, according to Lo.
In the Island’s worst rail accident in seven decades, 51 people have been confirmed dead after a packed train carrying over 490 passengers and crew slammed into a truck near the eastern city of Hualien on Friday.

The slamming caused the train to derail and the front part to crumple.

Government of Nepal and World Bank sign $75 million additional financing agreement for COVID-19 vaccines

KATHMANDU,  2021 – The Government of Nepal and the World Bank have signed an agreement for additional financing of $75 million to support access to safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines for Nepal’s prioritized populations.

The agreement was signed by the Finance Secretary, Sishir Kumar Dhungana on behalf of the Government of Nepal and the World Bank Country Director for Maldives, Nepal, and Sri Lanka, Faris Hadad-Zervos.

“The additional financing is an important and timely support to the government’s overall plans to vaccinate at least 72 percent of the Nepali population,” stated Sishir Kumar Dhungana, Finance Secretary“It supports the government’s health response to the pandemic, by supporting procurement of COVID-19 vaccines as well as strengthening health systems for their effective deployment as per the National Deployment and Vaccination Plan.”

The additional financing builds on the $29 million for the original COVID-19 Emergency Response and Health Systems Preparedness Project that was signed in April 2020. The project will be implemented under the leadership of the Ministry of Health and Population by the Department of Health Services and associated institutional bodies.

About 90 percent of the additional financing will support the purchase, supply and distribution of safe and effective COVID‐19 vaccines. The rest of the financing will support existing public health measures to test, trace and treat the COVID-19 infection through a strengthened health system; community engagement and risk communication to improve the demand and uptake of COVID-19 vaccines; and project implementation, monitoring and evaluation, and learning.

“Equitable and fast access to effective and safe COVID-19 vaccines is vital to save lives and support a resilient recovery from the pandemic,” stated Faris Hadad-Zervos, World Bank Country Director for Maldives, Nepal, and Sri Lanka“The World Bank is committed to support the government’s pandemic response to protect lives, strengthen systems for public health preparedness, and stimulate economic recovery in Nepal.”

The World Bank is taking action to help developing countries respond to the health, social and economic impacts of COVID-19. This includes $12 billion to help low- and middle-income countries purchase and distribute COVID-19 vaccines, tests, and treatments, and strengthen vaccination systems. The financing builds on the broader World Bank Group COVID-19 response, which is helping more than 100 countries strengthen health systems, support the poorest households, and create supportive conditions to maintain livelihoods and jobs for those hit hardest.

Prof Subedi featured in the flagship magazine of British Barristers

London – The flagship monthly magazine of the Bar Council of England has published, in its April 2021 issue, an article written by Barrister Adams Habteslasie highlighting the life and contribution of Professor and Barrister Surya P. Subedi, QC, OBE, DCL of the School of Law of the University of Leeds.

In its monthly column featuring inspiring legal celebrities in the UK, the magazine of British barristers, ‘Counsel’, has covered the profile of Professor Subedi analysing his accomplishments and his contribution to international law and human rights as a leading international jurist.

The article published with the title “Legal Personality – The International Human Rights Jurist- Surya Subedi QC”, includes Professor Subedi’s career and how he has combined his academic work with more practical work in the field of public international law and his contribution to top level policy formulation within and outside of the UN system of human rights.

It also highlights Professor Subedi’s publications, including his recently published book entitled “Human Rights in Eastern Civilisations.” Professor Subedi said that he was honoured by the publication of an article written by a Barrister highlighting his contribution in a prestigious magazine of a professional national legal institution of England and Wales.

The feature article is available at: https://www.counselmagazine.co.uk/articles/the-international-human-rights-jurist-surya-subedi-qc

South Asian Economies Bounce Back but Face Fragile Recovery

London Prospects of an economic rebound in South Asia are firming up as growth is set to increase by 7.2 percent in 2021 and 4.4 percent in 2022, climbing from historic lows in 2020 and putting the region on a path to recovery, a recently published report from World Bank says.

Growth is an uneven and economic activity well below pre-COVID-19 estimates, as many businesses need to make up for lost revenue and millions of workers, most of them in the informal sector, still reel from job losses, falling incomes, worsening inequalities, and human capital deficits says the World Bank in its twice-a-year regional update.

Released today, the latest South Asia Economic Focus: South Asia Vaccinates shows that the region is set to regain its historical growth rate by 2022. Electricity consumption and mobility data is a clear indication of recovering economic activity. India, which comprises the bulk of the region’s economy, is expected to grow more than 10 percent in the fiscal year 2021-22—a substantial upward revision of 4.7 percentage points from January 2021 forecasts.

 

The outlook for Bangladesh, Nepal, and Pakistan has also been revised upward, supported by better than expected remittance inflows: Bangladesh’s gross domestic product (GDP) is expected to increase by 3.6 percent in 2021; Nepal’s GDP is projected to grow by 2.7 percent in the fiscal year 2021-22 and recover to 5.1 percent by 2023; Pakistan’s growth is expected to reach 1.3 percent in 2021, slightly above previous projections.

 

The improved economic outlook reflects South Asian countries’ efforts to keep their COVID-19 caseload under control and swiftly roll out vaccine campaigns. Governments’ decisions to transition from widespread lockdowns to more targeted interventions, accommodating monetary policies and fiscal stimuli—through targeted cash transfers and employment compensation programs—have also propped up recovery, the report notes.

“We are encouraged to see clear signs of an economic rebound in South Asia, but the pandemic is not yet under control and the recovery remains fragile, calling for vigilance,” said Hartwig Schafer, World Bank Vice President for the South Asia Region“Going forward, South Asian countries need to ramp up their vaccination programs and invest their scarce resources wisely to set a foundation for a more inclusive and resilient future.” 

While laying bare South Asia’s deep-seated inequalities and vulnerabilities, the pandemic provides an opportunity to chart a path toward a more equitable and robust recovery. To that end, the report recommends that governments develop universal social insurance to protect informal workers, increase regional cooperation, and lift customs restrictions on key staples to prevent sudden spikes in food prices.

 

“The health and economic benefits from vaccinations greatly exceed the costs involved in purchasing and distributing vaccines for all South Asian countries,” said Hans Timmer, World Bank Chief Economist for the South Asia Region“South Asia has stepped up to vaccinate its people, but its healthcare capacity is limited as the region only spends 2 percent of its GDP on healthcare, lagging any other region. The main challenge ahead is to reprioritize limited resources and mobilize more revenue to reach the entire population and achieve full recovery.”

The World Bank, one of the largest sources of funding and knowledge for developing countries, is taking broad, fast action to help developing countries respond to the health, social and economic impacts of COVID-19. This includes $12 billion to help low- and middle-income countries purchase and distribute COVID-19 vaccines, tests, and treatments, and strengthen vaccination systems. The financing builds on the broader World Bank Group COVID-19 response, which is helping more than 100 countries strengthen health systems, support the poorest households, and create supportive conditions to maintain livelihoods and jobs for those hit hardest.

UK to install world-first network of underwater wildlife monitoring system

London — A world-first network of underwater camera systems is being rolled out across UK Overseas Territories to help protect sea life.

The cameras, which the Government says will make up the world’s largest wildlife-protecting ocean monitoring system, will track fish and other sea creatures in the Caribbean, South Atlantic, Indian, Pacific, and Southern Oceans.

Known as ‘baited remote underwater video systems’ (BRUVS), the cameras will film and analyse data on species including white marlin, silky sharks, black triggerfish, loggerhead turtles, Gould’s squid and sea snakes.

The £2 million network is part of the UK’s Blue Belt programme of marine protected areas around the globe. It is being installed in collaboration with Australian sea-monitoring firm Blue Abacus.

The UKOTs involved in the project are: Anguilla, Ascension Island, British Antarctic Territory, British Indian Ocean Territory, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Montserrat, Pitcairn, St Helena and Tristan da Cunha.

BRUVS will enable researchers to see below the surface and provide a benchmark of scientific understanding of the marine species within their maritime area, allowing the UKOTs to take more informed decisions about protecting and managing these diverse ecosystems.

The data the cameras collect will provide a standard measure of the status of both open ocean and reef species, letting scientists and the UKOTs set benchmarks for diversity and abundances. This will form valuable information on the many migratory species of open ocean and coastal reef fish species, assist in the management of data-poor fisheries and also improve our understanding of the functioning of pelagic and benthic ecosystems.

Co-founder of Blue Abacus and Professor at the University of Western Australia, Jessica Meeuwig said:

“The world’s tunas, sharks and large reef fish continue to decline in numbers and this trend must be reversed. This programme will give decision makers the evidence they need to act decisively in support of their blue economies.

We are delighted that the UK Government and Overseas Territories support the drive for increased knowledge as we rebuild our oceans. Our refinements to conventional underwater cameras are what makes possible the rollout of this programme over four ocean basins, the largest single such government-supported initiative globally.

We look forward to working with the communities in the Overseas Territories, building on their local knowledge and experience.”

The Global Ocean Wildlife Analysis Network of underwater stereo-baited cameras supports ongoing work amongst the UKOTs, many of which are part of the UK Government Blue Belt Programme, which now covers more than 4 million square kilometres of ocean.

Cefas project lead, Dr Paul Whomersley said:

“The UKOTs are taking a global lead on protecting their oceans and the wildlife and livelihoods that it supports.

Global Ocean Wildlife Analysis Network will provide UKOTs with a world-first network of stereo-baited remote underwater video systems which will enable us all to better understand the biodiversity, functioning and connectivity of these ocean areas, while providing valuable and necessary data to inform and develop UKOTs marine management and protection strategies.”

The project has received support from UK ministers and UKOT representatives.

Timothy Austin, Deputy Director, Research and Assessment, Cayman Islands Department of Environment said:

The Cayman Islands Department of Environment is very excited at the opportunity to participate in the Global Ocean Wildlife Analysis Network that will bring the BRUV network into the Caribbean region for the first time.

Nearshore benthic BRUVs have been an important research tool for informing marine species and protected area management in the Cayman Islands. The opportunity to take this technology further offshore will greatly enhance the Cayman Islands’ ability to implement meaningful and effective conservation regimes for this data limited, poorly understood, but crucially important ecosystem.

Diane Baum, Director of Conservation and Fisheries, Ascension Island Government said:

Ascension is committed to safeguarding its vast 445,000 square kilometer Marine Protected Area, but we recognise how challenging this will be. The support of the Blue Belt Programme and the opportunity to join Global Ocean Wildlife Analysis Network will help us to meet that challenge.

Our previous use of BRUVs has given us an insight into the amazing diversity of our open ocean ecosystems and enabled us to identify hotspots of biodiversity that need special protection. Being part of this initiative will provide Ascension with the information we need to take good local management decisions.

It will also strengthen the network of UK Overseas Territories that is driving improvements in marine conservation at a global scale. Ascension aspires to be the best MPA in the world by basing its management on sound evidence, adopting new technologies and seeking inspirational international partners; this project achieves all three.

Dr Simon Morley, British Antarctic Survey, representing British Antarctic Territory said:

Science is constantly striving to find innovative solutions to monitor the marine environment and these baited cameras offer a solution to help us better understand mid-water communities close to shore along the Antarctic Peninsula. This global network, gives us an excellent opportunity to compare different oceans and understanding the impact of our changing climate.

Over the next few months, complete sets of carbon-fibre stereo-BRUVS and associated equipment will be delivered to the UK Overseas Territories.

This initiative builds on progress to date through the Blue Belt programme to improve our understanding of the marine environment of the UKOTs, and to ensure these diverse ecosystems are protected and managed for future generations. Through the programme, the UKOTs have put in place large-scale marine protection and management measures which cover an area of over 4 million square kilometres.

Missed opportunities by the younger generation: Can we change?

My friend suggested to me that I need to write targeting the younger generation of Nepal. I started brainstorming myself to find a suitable topic that could reach out to the promising younger generation of the country, and that they would read twice. I wondered if I should write once again on next-generation leadership, but decided not to reinvent the wheel as it did not get much attention from some of our hopeful leaders. I also discarded the idea to write something on the young generation’s role to shape the development and country, as it would end up becoming a theoretical NGO/INGO report to some donors. I instead decided to write about a common topic of discussion, often discussed in social media or elsewhere by frustrated younger generation Nepalis. It is about the wishful thinking of the emergence of a capable leader who can lead the country towards prosperity. I started calculating the number of opportunities that the country has missed because of the younger generation.

I am a physician trained to make a diagnosis based on minute details of signs and symptoms; an anthropologist, trained to interpret people’s behavior, culture and social practices; an epidemiologist, trained to establish correlation and association of causes (causal relations) and a trained MBA who believes that every problem has a solution when there is a will. By virtue of my training, let me diagnose the root causes of problems, how they have evolved, and manage them.

Let us start with our history and events; the younger generation was in the frontline almost every decade to bring political changes in the country. The role of younger generation to oust the Rana dynasty to reinstate the King in 1951; the first-ever formation of democratic government in 1959; establishment of a constitutional monarchy in 1990; ten years of conflict and popular people’s movement in 2005-06 BS, which removed the Shah dynasty and established a federal democratic republic were crucial. Does anyone see missed opportunities? These opportunities should have resulted in prosperous and socio-economically vibrant Nepal but look at where we are now. If I ask now the causes of the current situation, everyone with a loud and uniform voice will rely on the same rhetoric that we did not get a good, honest and visionary leader. Therefore, we expect some ex-figures to return or expect an honest dictator or a good bureaucrat to rule the country even though the constitutional mandate and democratic practices we all fought for will not allow. This reminds me of a famous proverb of Comte de Maistre, who said that in a democracy, the people get the leaders they deserve. Before I put forward my analysis, I would encourage all to sit back and think about what have been our own contribution to development, what have been our roles and responsibilities and whether we are doing our part.

Playing Your Part

Perhaps some are thinking that they are doing their part by participating in people’s movement and elections. A few might say that they are paying tax to the government, and some may be thinking that whoever comes or rules all are the same and their voice has no value. This is how we miss opportunities. Imagine if our parents or siblings had abandoned us, we would not be reading this article now. If they can take care of us, why cannot we take care of the achievements of people’s movements and elections? Did we contribute after that? Let me ask a straightforward question, how many of us, while walking in the street, stopped and picked up an empty noodles packet lying on the street and disposed them in the bins? I know some of us will immediately say that our cities do not have enough bins. How many of us spit on the street and how many of us do not follow the queue in public transport, theatre or temples? Imagine if all from the younger generation do these simple things, we would possibly have made our cities clean and respectable places. But we all want that someone picks up the empty ‘Wai-Wai’ packets strewn on the street because we think someone is paid for that; if I spit, no one will care about it as the street is already dirty, or that I am more important than others and that I do not have to follow the rules. If we collectively thought of our individual responsibilities and practiced them regularly, it becomes a habit and changes would be observable- cities would look cleaner, and people are more disciplined. Collective action can make changes.

There are many unemployed citizens, and those who are employed are they doing their job with diligence and accountability? Yet how much time do we actually spend on work-related activities, and how many of us avoid gossiping sessions in the cafeteria? How many of us read about recent advances in our work-related areas and how many of us have misused office resources for personal use? We may never reflect on these questions as they are uncomfortable questions.  We come up with many excuses, such as putting the blame on supervisors or seniors, that it is in practice for long, and thus these are new norms. How many of us have we raised our voices against seniors or colleagues who are not honest with their work? If not, then complaining in social media and gossip platforms that we do not have leaders is just an excuse of our own incompetency. If every young generation ensures diligence and accountability towards their work and raises its voice against those who are not doing their job properly,  we can induce accountability and diligence in all sectors including the political sphere.

Stop blaming others; First, do your part

You may be thinking I am only blaming the young generation for missed opportunities. While their political leaders are to be blamed, yet  they are not the only ones who should be blamed for the current status. It is the younger generation in different times that made leaders, and maintained them and missed many opportunities to bring about positive and transformative change we have always wished for. Since 1990, we have had all opportunities to choose good, honest, and visionary leaders.  Have we succeeded? The answer is clearly no.

There are three groups of younger generations- the first one dedicated to political parties as cadres, the second one are these days known as  “Hanumans” as connoted in social media, and the last group are the more politically neutral youngsters, among whom are some that are active on complaining.

Youth dedicated to political parties are the only ones who can break the syndicate of leadership within their respective political parties. If you continue singing a song the way your “goot ” wants, we will all land in the vicious cycle. Such cadres should first ask the question whether the leader they are aligned to is delivering what s/he is intended to deliver. If not, either leave them or raise the voice for change. If you are not leaving or raising voice, that means you are not doing your part, not being accountable and sincere. Hanumans are blind supporters who rely financial and politically on their benefactors and the ones who are creating a smokescreen for the leaders. The devotion of Hanumans to their Rams is beyond doubt, and they believe that the world is so good because of their benefactor the Rams. Buoyed by such allegiances, the  arrogance of such Rams reaches to  newer heights when they start to think that they are invincible.  These youths should ask themselves if they are aware that they are misleading their Rams and the country as a whole. The third group is usually a game-changer in elections. Every political party have their own cadres and Hanumans, and naturally, they are not the one who swings election results. The one who swings election results falls in this category of the young generation. They are the commonest ones who complain that they do not have good leaders but still select the same old face. They are the one who want some ex-figures to come back or some bureaucrat to run the country or opt for autocracy, without seeing the pitfalls of losing democracy and fundamental freedoms.

Irrespective of the above categories, the younger generation must be motivated to lead. Leading does not mean that you need to become a political leader. You can lead yourself first, then be a leader at home, community, workplaces, schools, and colleges. Let us take an example, can the younger generation from schools and colleges lead by respecting teachers and friends, sharing what you learned, and learning from others. Stop those who use colleges for politics, isolate them who disrespect college etiquette and rules and raise voice against the absence of teachers or lack of quality education.  Be a leader to do your part and, in other words, be responsible, accountable and honest. 

Leaders are made by the people, of the people and for the people. A leader of sheep is always a sheep. It is not a goat or a cow. Therefore, if we want good, honest and visionary leaders, we all need to be good, honest and visionary first as future leaders would come from among us. Rather than spending time following rhetoric, Hanuman-giri and complaining, the younger generation should start by doing its part first. Show your accountability and responsibility in every opportunity, be it at home, at the workplace, community, public spaces including in the social media and during, elections.  Change starts with you! 

Dr Kandel is a medical epidemiologist and anthropologist. The views expressed here are strictly personal views of the author.

@kandelnirmal

Covid: England adds Pakistan, Bangladesh, Kenya and Philippines to travel ‘red list’

PTI, New Delhi — Pakistan and Bangladesh are among four additional countries added to the “red list” of nations from where travel to and from England is banned to control the spread of coronavirus.

The ban announced on Friday will come into effect from April 9 and also cover the Philippines and Kenya in response to concerns about new variants of COVID-19 in those regions, like those detected in South Africa and Brazil.

India currently is not on the red list of countries, with an air bubble arrangement in operation for essential travel while non-essential international travel from the UK remains banned under current lockdown rules.

“Philippines, Pakistan, Kenya and Bangladesh have been added to England’s red list to protect the country against new variants of coronavirus (COVID-19), at a critical time for the vaccine programme,” the Department for Transport (DfT) said in a statement.

“With over 30 million vaccinations delivered in the UK so far, the additional restrictions will help to reduce the risk of new variants – such as those first identified in South Africa (SA) and Brazil – entering England. So far, surveillance has found that few cases of the SA variant have been identified as being imported from Europe, with most coming from other parts of the world,” it said.

From 4 am local time next week Friday, international visitors who have departed from or transited through these four additional countries on a 40-country red list in the previous 10 days will be refused entry into England.

Only British and Irish citizens, or those with residence rights in the UK (including long-term visa holders), will be allowed to enter and they must stay in a government-approved quarantine facility for 10 days.

They will also be required to arrive into a designated port. No direct flight bans from these countries will be put in place, but passengers are advised to check their travel plans before departing for England.

“British nationals currently in the countries on the red list should make use of the commercial options available if they wish to return to England. Commercial routes that will enable British and Irish nationals and residents to return to England continue to operate,” the DfT said.

Overseas travel is likely to ease for Britons only after May 17, as part of the UK government’s phased roadmap for lifting coronavirus lockdown restrictions.

Prince Harry’s critics have a point: woke capitalism is no solution

Disclosure statement
Carl Rhodes does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Prince Harry has copped a pasting in the British media for his new job as “chief impact officer” with Silicon Valley startup BetterUp.

His role, and the company’s business model, has been called the “latest expression of woke capitalism” in venerable conservative magazine The Spectator. Other critics have chimed in, derideing the “Prince of Woke Capital” for “surfing a wave of wokery towards an economic abyss”.

Ridiculing people and corporations for being “woke” is, of course, a relatively easy sport for pundits on the right of the political spectrum. Harry’s critics have a point that woke capitalism involves vapid political correctness, even if they are missing its more serious ramifications for social and economic inequality.

The origin of woke

First, let’s recap the meaning of “woke” and “woke capitalism”.

The use of the term “woke” by African Americans has been traced back at least to the 1920s, though Oxford English Dictionary researchers say its meaning as being alert to systemic issues of injustice and discrimination emerged from the American civil rights movement in the 1960s.

It became more widely known with the advent of the Black Lives Matter movement in 2013 (following the acquittal of Florida man George Zimmerman for shooting dead African-American teen Trayvon Martin).

As academics Elaine Richardson and Alice Ragland explain in a 2018 article, BLM activists used the hashtag #staywoke to urge fellow African Americans “to remain aware of what is going on around you and in society, more specifically, to remain politically aware or conscious”.

It didn’t take long for “woke” to enter mainstream culture. In 2016 the American Dialect Society declared it the slang word of the year. They defined “woke” as being “conscious, aware or enlightened, especially with regards to matters of social justice and racial inequity”.

Capitalising woke

In entering the mainstream, though, the meaning of “woke” was soon distorted. Those on the right of politics co-opted it as a term of derision – akin to “social justice warrior” – for people (especially white people) who bragged about their self-righteous positions on political issues.

What started as a serious call to political consciousness was manipulated to become a way of dismissing anyone who professed vaguely progressive views.

This wasn’t limited to individuals. Corporations too could be chastised for being woke.

In 2018, New York Times columnist Ross Douthat wrote about the trend of corporations and chief executives aligning themselves to progressive social concerns, such as immigration and gay and transgender rights, while they continued to push their own economic “self-interest on tax policy and corporate stinginess in paychecks”.

The term “woke capitalism” soon came to express the approach of companies who claim a “social licence to operate” through their public advocacy on social issues, without affecting the economic status quo.

Harry gets appy

What has all of this got to do with Prince Harry and BetterUp?

Let’s clarify what BetterUp is.

Media reports have described the San Francisco-based company as a startup “that provides employee coaching and mental health assistance”.

The company itself describes its business as being about “changing the world by bringing the power of transformation to each and every person”. Announcing the prince’s appointment, chief executive Alexi Robichaux declared:

“Prince Harry will expand on the work he’s been doing for years, as he educates and inspires our community and champions the importance of focusing on preventative mental fitness and human potential worldwide.”

The title of chief impact officer – or “chimpo” – comes from the not-profit sector. There’s no one accepted job decription, but such roles generally involve working to ensure an organisation is actually achieving its stated vision and mission.

How does this apply to BetterUp? That’s unclear.

Remove all the marketing babble and this is a company that exists to make a profit. Its core business appears to be an app selling professional coaching services. Its promise is to make people more “positive, engaged, and connected to every part of their lives”, both personal and professional.

In reality, the chief impact the prince is likely to have is attracting publicity for the app – helping BetterUp’s bottom line, and Harry’s bank balance.

Everyone’s a winner?

The way in which BetterUp has wrapped its reality in the language of social concern and human progress bears all the worst hallmarks of “woke capitalism”.

Its business model is all about individual empowerment. This shows no apparent awareness of the need to address systemic social and economic inequities. It would also have us believe we can all “make it” in that world, if we just get the right mental attitude.

Yet the connection between entrenched economic inequalities and myriad social problems including mental illness are well-documented. As the World Health Organization concludes, mental disorders are shaped by social and economic factors, with inequality being chief among them.

Over the past 30 years, according to the United Nations World Social Report for 2020, income inequality has become worse in most developed countries.

The irony is that Harry epitomises this inequality, and the limitations of meritocracy. He is the very embodiment of unearned wealth and privilege. Would he have gotten this job except for the family he was born into? Unlikely. How much is he being paid to push the idea that anyone can achieve success? BetterUp isn’t saying. Nor is he.

So while it easy to agree with criticisms of Prince Harry’s new “job” as an expression of woke capitalism, this cannot simply be dismissed as misplaced political correctness.

Inequality is the problem. Woke capitalism is not the solution. ( From :  The Conversation)

UK report denies systemic racism, prompting angry backlash

In an anticipated report published on Wednesday, the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities said the UK was not yet a “post-racial country” but should be regarded as a “model for other white-majority countries”, citing achievements towards equality in the sectors of education and economy.

While the report acknowledged “overt and outright” racism persisted and said some communities were “haunted” by historic discrimination, it downplayed the importance of systemic racism in explaining inequalities in areas such as health and crime.

The UK, it said, was no longer a country where the system is “deliberately rigged” against ethnic minorities.

“Impediments and disparities do exist, they are varied, and ironically very few of them are directly to do with racism,” the 258-page report said. “The evidence shows that geography, family influence, socio-economic background, culture and religion have more significant impact on life chances than the existence of racism.”

But opposition politicians and campaigners were quick to dismiss the commission’s conclusions.

Halima Begum, director of the UK’s Runnymede Trust race equality think-tank, said the report had been “written to a script” defined by Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s government, as she labelled it an “utter whitewash”.

“In it, the government cannot even bring itself to acknowledge or show any empathy for the incidence of racism in the UK,” Begum told Al Jazeera.

“Frankly, by denying the evidence of institutional racism … I think they’ve insulted every ethnic minority in this country – the very people who continue to experience racism on a daily basis.”

The Institute of Race Relations (IRR), another UK-based think-tank, said in a statement: “We can see no attempt here to address the common ethnic minority experience of structural racism within areas such as the criminal justice system.”

The report’s findings, the IRR said, “fit neatly with the government’s attempts, post-Brexit, to portray the British nation as a beacon of good race relations and a diversity model”.

The Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities was set up by Johnson after anti-racism protests swept the UK last summer following the death of George Floyd in the United States.

It had been due to publish its report last year. The delay was blamed on COVID-19 restrictions and the high number of responses from the public.

A spokesperson for Black Lives Matter UK told Al Jazeera the commission’s conclusions highlighted a bleak reality that Black Britons’ voices are still not heard.

“We didn’t need another report. We needed to start looking at implementing impactful and lasting change,” the spokesperson said, adding the criminal justice system and policing methods – including controversial stop-and-search procedures, needed reform.

“We need action,” they said.

Recommendations to ‘remove obstacles for everyone’

The report said children from ethnic minority communities often performed as well as, or better than, white pupils.

Students of Black Caribbean heritage were the only group to register lower attainment levels, it said.

As evidence of an “improving picture” at workplaces, it cited increased diversity in professions such as medicine and law and a shrinking race pay gap overall, which stood at 2.3 percent.

“The well-meaning idealism of many young people who claim the country is still institutionally racist is not borne out by the evidence,” the report said.

“The country has come a long way in 50 years and the success of much of the ethnic minority population in education and, to a lesser extent, the economy, should be regarded as a model for other white-majority countries.”

In light of its findings, the commission made 24 recommendations “designed to remove obstacles for everyone, rather than specific groups”.

One suggestion was to end the use of the BAME acronym, meaning Black, Asian and minority ethnic, which it called “unhelpful”.

Another idea was to establish an office for health disparities aimed at reducing inequalities, and a third example focused on encouraging companies to move away from unconscious bias training in favour of seemingly vague new interventions to “advance fairness in the workplace”.

But opposition Labour Party MP and shadow secretary of state for justice David Lammy said the government had missed an opportunity to address an “overwhelming desire for change” after Floyd’s killing.

The report, he said, could have been a “turning point and a moment to come together” but instead had divided the UK once more.

“British people – Black and white – are crying out to turn the page on racism,” Lammy tweeted. “With this report, Boris Johnson is standing in their way.” ( From : Al Jazeera)

India reports 72,330 new COVID-19 cases, 459 deaths in 24 hours

ANI, New Delhi —   India reported 72,330 new COVID-19 cases and 459 related deaths in the last 24 hours, informed the union health ministry on Thursday.

With these additional cases, the total number of Covid-19 cases in the country reached 1,22,21,665. With 459 new deaths, the death toll in India has soared up to 1,62,927.

There are 5,84,055 active cases in the nation as of now. Furthermore, 40,382 people were discharged after recovery on Wednesday, taking the nationwide recovery tally to 1,14,74,683.

As per the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), 11,25,681 samples were tested on Wednesday. A total of 24,47,98,621 samples have been tested so far. Meanwhile, according to the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, a total of 6,51,17,896 people have been vaccinated across the country till now.

From today, the government will vaccinate all above 45 years. India had started its vaccination drive on January 16 with priority given to all healthcare and frontline workers in the first phase.

The second phase started on March 1 where doses are being administered to people above the age of 60 and those between 45 and 59 years with specific comorbidities.

With several parts of the country witnessing a spike in Covid-19 cases, the central government on Tuesday warned that the situation is going from “bad to worse” and urged states to achieve 100 percent vaccination coverage of those above the age of 45 years in surge districts within the next two weeks.